Technological Tools And Communication Question Response

Technological Tools and Communication Question Response

What are the best tools we have that help us evaluate information communicated through technology? Thinking about the concepts from this semester (such as warranting theory, communication privacy management, diffusion, media/technological literacy or anything else) what cues can we look to which will give us confidence that information is accurate? Is it easier to fabricate information with the use of technology or is it easier to evaluate information because of technology? Support your argument.

Technological Tools and Communication Question Response

REPLY TO:
believe that both media literacy and the warranting theory are the best tools for evaluating information communicated through technology. Media literacy is described as the ability to understand messages being sent and understanding how to create and evaluate these messages. When evaluating media messages there are four key components to look for including relevance, accuracy, bias, and reliability.

Making sure these four components are met is an easy task to take on and it provides confidence in the information; in order to check for accuracy, we can compare multiple sources for the same bits of information. Using sources from an educational or government website can enforce reliability because these sources are more likely to be peer reviewed and contain citations. Scanning the title and the description of the source is a great way to check relevance and bias.

 

The Warranting theory is very interesting because it evaluates the information people disclose to each other. This theory investigates how the information we personally provide, the information others provide about us, and the information the website or media platform provides about us can reinforce or weaken the self- disclosures made to others.

Looking at a bunch of clues on a media platform can give other people the power to evaluate what claims are true or false based on the warranty of the claim; this means how easy it would be to fabricate the claim. I believe that the use of the internet can give us the same ability to fabricate information and evaluate information, it depends on the media literacy of those using it.

order now

Cultural Influenced Communication Reflection Essay Assignment

We have explored many facets of culture this week and considered how various cultural structures influence communication. We have taken some time to consider how these influences affect our lives in many different ways.

After reading Chapter 2 and going through the modules, please create a short reflection post discussing how this week’s concepts apply to you in your life. Please feel free to discuss situations that happen to you often or memorable experiences you have had that created an impact in your life.

Technological Tools and Communication Question Response

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

 

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84  points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76  points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49  points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

A Technological Tools and Communication Question Response
CCCCCCC HHHHH XXXXXXXXX
or

Technological Tools and Communication Question Response

Technological Tools and Communication Question Response