Santa Monica Clear Thinking College Book Report

Santa Monica Clear Thinking College Book Report
Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457 Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5% Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6 Course Level: Masters/University College Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Santa Monica Clear Thinking College Book Report

BOOK REPORT:

If turn in a report on one of these books, you can receive up to 30 extra-credit points toward your
final course grade. To earn the full 30 points, this book report must show real effort not only at
understanding the material. The report must meet minimum standards of grammar, punctuation, etc

Book is: Clear Thinking: A Practical Introduction — Hy Ruchlis

you can find the book at: https://roxbury.beverlyhills.org/search/o21563061

Hard copy is at the beveryly hill’s public library

Plattsburgh Symbolic Interactionism Communications Essay

The final assignment for the semester is to construct a “literature review,” or a summary of some existing research related to a particular communication theory we have covered in the course. Normally, a literature review is one component of a research paper. For this assignment, however, your task is just to find three (3) scholarly sources (i.e. from academic journals) that have dealt substantially with one of the communication theories discussed during the course.

Your discussion of each of these sources should have two main parts. First, summarize the source in terms of its specific research questions (i.e. what the author(s) of the piece were investigating), the data and methods used to investigate those questions, and the major arguments or findings that emerge from the analysis. Second, consider how each article that you find contributes something to our understanding of the particular theory in question. Do the author(s)’s findings provide a new way of thinking about or applying the concept? Do they suggest that it has flaws? Does the source simply show the limitations of what the theory can and can’t explain?

Each entry will probably vary a little bit in length depending on the length of the source, but in general they should be at least a page.

Additionally, good literature reviews are not simply a series of summaries. Do your best to include an introductory paragraph (of a few sentences) that provides some overall characterization of the theory you decided to explore further (this can just be drawn from what we learned in class about it), how the sources you found compare and contrast with one another, and how they collectively contribute something to our understanding of the theory in question.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

 

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84  points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76  points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49  points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

A BBBBB
CCCCCCC HHHHH XXXXXXXXX
or

Santa Monica Clear Thinking College Book Report

Santa Monica Clear Thinking College Book Report

Simply Easy Learning

Buy Custom Essay

Simply Easy Learning

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!