Oklahoma Effective Coaching Case Study Discussion

Oklahoma Effective Coaching Case Study Discussion

Introductory paragraph—Introduce the problem/subject/issue and explain why an interdisciplinary approach is necessary to address the problem. This paragraph should summarize what you argue throughout the entire essay.

Describe the problem/subject/issue in greater detail (Broad Model step 1)

Explain why the problem or research question requires an interdisciplinary approach (Broad Model step 2)

Identify the disciplines relevant to the problem (Broad Model step 3)

Identify insights gained from each discipline (Broad Model step 4)—This is where you will draw specific information from your research, including citations and quotations when relevant.

Critically analyze the disciplinary insights (Broad Model step 5)—This is where you will (1) identify sources of conflict and/or agreement between disciplinary insights, and (2) explain how the contributing disciplines are interconnected.

order now

Explain how using an interdisciplinary approach enlarges our understanding of the problem (Broad Model step 6)—This is where you conclude your essay.

Bibliography—Include a bibliography of all sources cited in your essay (minimum of four, preferably more).

Foundations of Modern Western Democracy Paper

Please address the prompt below in a short essay of 600-750 words. I will evaluate your essay according to how well it (1) addresses the prompt (make sure you have carefully read the question and address all parts), (2) incorporates various readings from the course, (3) demonstrates an understanding of essential course concepts, and (4) critically engages with these concepts to present a formidable argument in response to the prompt.

Although grammar and writing style will not be formally evaluated, well organized and clearly stated ideas always make the strongest argument. Matthew Woessner’s “A Guide to Essay Exams (Links to an external site.)” offers some useful advice. You can review the rubric I will use to evaluate your essay on this assignment.

Be sure to utilize the course readings from the second module in your response and to include parenthetical citations whenever appropriate (i.e., any time you are summarizing, re-phrasing, or quoting from one of the readings). You may use whatever citation style you choose, but be consistent. If you are citing reading assigned in our course, you need not include a separate bibliography or works cited page. You may, but are not required, to use additional sources. If you use any additional sources, you must cite those as well and include a works cited/bibliography.

Prompt:

Enlightenment thought—specifically the emphasis on reason as the primary authority and importance of individual liberty—is widely understood as the foundation of modern Western democracy. Drawing on the readings and our discussions of Kant, Mill, and Dewey explain how these ideas shape perspectives on the public sphere and the role of the public in democracy. In your response, consider the relevance of reason in expectations of the public sphere, the relationship or role of the individual in the public, and the function of the public or public sphere in democracy.

To conclude, provide your own assessment, supported by evidence from the readings and class discussions, about the proper role of the public in our democracy and how best to cultivate such a public.

Oklahoma Effective Coaching Case Study Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

 

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84  points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76  points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49  points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

A Oklahoma Effective Coaching Case Study Discussion
CCCCCCC HHHHH XXXXXXXXX
or

Oklahoma Effective Coaching Case Study Discussion

Oklahoma Effective Coaching Case Study Discussion