LAPC Communications Removal Of Mount Rushmore Discussion

LAPC Communications Removal of Mount Rushmore Discussion

Describe a situation in which someone ascribed an identity to you that didn’t match your avowed identity. Why do you think the person ascribed the identity to you? Were there any stereotypes involved? What was your reaction? (NOTE: avowed/ascribed identity doesn’t have to simply focus on race/ethnicity/nationality, but can include any other parts of your cultural identity such as gender, sexuality, and class, etc.) (at least 125 words)

Read one of the following articles. Briefly summarize the article then identify and explain at least two reasons why it is a segregated, contested, or hybrid cultural space. What is your position on the issue? (at least 125 words)

Option A: “Want to tear down insidious monuments to racism and segregation? Bulldoze L.A. freeways”Actions

Option B: “Native tribal leaders are calling for the removal of Mount Rushmore”

Communication Ethics Moral Problems Memo on Long Working Hours Essay

Introduction

Throughout this course, you as a communication researcher or practitioner will critically examine one or more moral problems that surface while working on a project in an organization.

Moral problems in any workplace can vary substantially, so the kind of moral problems on which your memo should focus requires some clarification. Your moral problems must relate to a communication research study or communication project.

For example, they cannot focus on how an organization would address an employee’s experience with sexual harassment from a supervisor, but they could focus on how the organization would communicate with other employees if they were to find out about the incident and subsequently demand that senior management inform them about how the organization will respond.

As another example, your moral problems could not relate to how an organization would respond to an employee discovered to have committed fraud, but it could focus on how the organization would communicate to the press, which has found out about the incident.

Memo Directions
Include the following in your assignment: (a) heading, (b)      body, and (c) references.

Limit this stage of your memo to a maximum of 400 words with      1-inch margins, 12-point serif font, and double-spacing. APA format.

Create your memo’s heading, which identifies who you want to      read the memo.  In particular:

At the top of your paper, write the name of the organization       in which the moral problem takes place.  It will serve as your       letterhead.

order now

In the “TO” line, (a) name the decisionmaker in your organization (e.g., co-directors).

In the “FR” line, ?You do not need to       write this part?.

In the “RE” line, give a brief name for the moral problem, ensuring it explicitly connects with the rest of your memo.

Start the body of your memo by stating the purpose of the memo      in the context of your communication project.  Also write one or two      sentences that summarize the project, giving just enough detail to help      the reader understand the remainder of the memo.

Next insert the section title “The Challenge.”

Use the present tense for this section.

Then use prose to answer the questions below.  Do not      merely restate the questions and provide their answers.  Instead,      ensure that the body has a narrative flow.

What does the organization need to decide?  Ensure the       decision relates to communication research or practice.

What are the one or more moral problems?

How are different stakeholders affected?  If you identify       more than 3 stakeholders, limit your analysis to the 3 most important       stakeholders.

For each stakeholder, could this individual or group of people       voluntarily choose whether to be affected?

Throughout this section, provide sufficient support for your      statements with (a) facts and (b) values from organizational overviews      (e.g., an “About Us” page on a website) or codes of conduct (e.g., “Code      of Ethics,” “Principles of Professional Practice,” or “Responsible Code of      Conduct”) and professional codes of conduct.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

 

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84  points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76  points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49  points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

A LAPC Communications Removal of Mount Rushmore Discussion
CCCCCCC HHHHH XXXXXXXXX
or

LAPC Communications Removal of Mount Rushmore Discussion

LAPC Communications Removal of Mount Rushmore Discussion