COM 105 Culture And Intercultural Competence Discussion

COM 105 Culture and Intercultural Competence Discussion

Please help me with my discussion question,

While formal intercultural experiences like studying abroad or volunteering for the Special Olympics or a shelter for LGBTQ youth can provide opportunities for deep learning, informal intercultural involvement also plays a significant role in our ability and desire to build Intercultural Communication Competency (ICC). Taking the time to reflect on “critical incidents” or what we call the “a-ha! moments” in our lives, bring those formal and informal experiences together and provide a tool for meta-competence. Furio Bednarz, “Building Up Intercultural Competences: Challenges and Learning Processes,” in Building Competencies: A Handbook for Professionals in Education, Social Work, and Health Care, eds. Maria Giovanna Onorati and Furio Bednarz (Leuven, Belgium: Acco, 2010), 47–51.

** watch the following video and describe–

What this speaker is attempting to say to you

How she has helped or hindered your understanding of intercultural competence

How you would respond to the belief that– We cannot truly understand and appreciate another person’s culture until we recognize, understand, and appreciate our own

What else are you thinking about? What are you feeling? What are you believing? Do you have other comments you’d like to make?

Remember as you develop your response, you’ll want to include your perspective supported by materials from the video and the readings within this unit.

Click on “cc” at the bottom right of the video for assistance with closed captioning.

TEDx Talks. (2016b, December 14). The Muslim on the airplane | Amal Kassir | TEDx Mile High Women [Video]. YouTube.

After you’ve posted your response (of a minimum 15 to 20 sentences), take time to view as many of your classmates’ comments as possible. What are they saying? What are they describing? What have they learned about improving intercultural competence? Does it coincide with your perspective?

Take time then to respond to at least 3 of your peers. This will be your final opportunity to connect with the individuals in your class. Make it count. Use what you’ve learned to engage in a crucial conversation about intercultural communication.

CNUAS ADR Negotiation Fundamentals Discussion Questions

What are some key challenges facing intercultural negotiators?

What do you think are some key predictors of success in intercultural negotiation?

order now

How do you think roles, norms, and party status change during a negotiation conducted over electronic media?

Have you ever negotiated over the internet or by e mail? If so, what problems did you encounter and why? If you have never negotiated over the internet or e mail, do you trust that process would be beneficial in any way to you?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

 

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84  points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76  points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49  points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

A BBBBB
CCCCCCC HHHHH XXXXXXXXX
or

COM 105 Culture and Intercultural Competence Discussion

COM 105 Culture and Intercultural Competence Discussion